Writ petition was dismissed as infructuous due to the lodging of an FIR in the underlying case, as stated by the Additional Chief Standing Counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:4377
Court No. - 76
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 350 of 2025
Petitioner :- Smt Ankita And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Maheshwari Yadav,Saroj Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
Order Date :- 8.1.2025 Ujjawal
Justice Vinod Diwakar
Digitally signed by :- UJJAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Ankita And Another
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Vinod Diwakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
