The court held that a writ petition does not lie for seeking declaration and injunction regarding demolition threats when a civil suit is already pending. The petition is consigned to records, leaving the remedy before the competent civil court open.
Petition consigned to records; remedy to be pursued in pending civil suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:16782-DB
Court No. - 29
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3314 of 2025
Petitioner :- Chhanna And 9 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bimla Prasad Counsel for Respondent :- Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi,C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Donadi Ramesh,J.
Order Date :- 5.2.2025 Ashok Kr.
Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition is maintainable for seeking declaration and injunction regarding a threat of demolition when a civil suit is pending.
Chhanna And 9 Others
State Of U.P. And 6 Others
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
Donadi Ramesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
