Disposed¶10

Sarvjeet v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Allahabad HC7 Jul 2025WRIC/3127/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Mandamus for expeditious disposal of pending partition suit; writ petition disposed at admission stage without counter affidavit; six-month timeline from certified copy; U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act (Section 176 in prayer, Section 196 in narrative, as printed); Case No. T2015020307445 of 2015; Ram Narayan v. Radheyshyam; Sarvjeet v. State of U.P.; Allahabad High Court; 2025:AHC:106548; 7.7.2025.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No. 2 to decide Case No. T-2015020307445 of 2015 (Ram Narayan Versus Radheyshyam and others) in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within six months from production of a certified copy of the order; writ petition disposed of at admission stage without counter affidavit. ¶10

Sarvjeet vs State of U.P. and 5 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶10

Issue for consideration

Whether the Court should issue a mandamus directing respondent no. 2 to decide Case No. T2015020307445 of 2015 (Ram Narayan Versus Radheyshyam and others), pending since 2015, within a stipulated time period.

¶7

Court's answer

No useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or issuing notice to the private respondents; the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage without calling for counter affidavit.

¶9

Ratio / Principle

A direction is issued upon respondent No. 2 to decide Case No. T-2015020307445 of 2015 (Ram Narayan Versus Radheyshyam and others) in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties.

¶9

Key takeaways

The decision is to be made preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of the order.ratio¶9
The Court made it clear that it has not adjudicated the case on merit.obiter¶11

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal, J.; Neutral Citation No. 2025:AHC:106548; Order Date 7.7.2025) disposed of WRIT - C No. 3127 of 2025 (Sarvjeet v. State of U.P. and 5 others) at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit and without notice to the private respondents. The Court directed respondent No. 2 to decide Case No. T-2015020307445 of 2015 (Ram Narayan Versus Radheyshyam and others) — described as a partition suit under the U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act pending since 2015 (the prayer cites Section 176; the narrative cites Section 196) — in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within six months from production of a certified copy of the order. The Court expressly clarified that it had not adjudicated the case on merit.

Sarvjeet v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sarvjeet v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bansh Raj vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Dhruv Chandra Shukla vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Indresh vs Surendra Kumar Tiwari Secretary Basic Education Board

Balakram vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Umashankar Dubey vs Additional Commissioner (Administration) and 2 Others

Sanskar Academy Samiti vs State of U.P. and 8 Others