Writ petition seeking mandamus to restrain state respondents from interfering with the petitioners' peaceful married life. The State contended no cause of action survived since the petition related to circumstances of 2024. The court found the prayer redundant and dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:57864
Court No. - 74
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1992 of 2024
Petitioner :- Smt Parul Yadav And Another Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 18.4.2025 Saif
Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a mandamus restraining respondents from interfering in the petitioners' marital life should be issued when no cause of action survives?
Smt Parul Yadav
State Of Up
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
