Sanjay Mall v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed as not pressed at counsel's request, with liberty to pursue alternative remedies available in law.
Writ petition dismissed as not pressed at counsel's request, with liberty to pursue alternative remedies available in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:10719
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1916 of 2025
Petitioner :- Sanjay Mall Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sushil Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed as the petitioner wants to avail other alternative remedy available in law. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty.
Order Date :- 22.1.2025 NS
Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Sanjay Mall
State Of U.P.
Saral Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court