Writ petition of 2018 dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner did not appear to press it; the Standing Counsel was present for the State.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 14116 of 2018
Ganga Ram Yadav
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. The Secy. Food And Ors.
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinay Tripathi, Saurabh Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 6
HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J.
None appears for the petitioner to press the present petition which is of the year 2018 whereas the learned Standing Counsel for the Staterespondents is present.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Consigned to records.
(Jaspreet Singh,J.)
October 7, 2025
Asheesh
Digitally signed by :- ASHEESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ganga Ram Yadav
State Of U.P. Thru. The Secy. Food And Ors.
Jaspreet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
