Disposed¶8

Krishna Vati v. State of U.P. Thru. Commissioner and Secy. Board of Revenue and 3 Others

Allahabad HC9 Dec 2025WRIC/11561/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; WRIT-C 11561 of 2025; Krishna Vati v. State of U.P. (Commissioner and Secretary, Board of Revenue) and others; interim order; notice to respondent No. 4; dasti personal service; listing 15.01.2026; judges Shekhar B. Saraf and Manjive Shukla; dated 09.12.2025.

What did the court decide?

Interim procedural directions only: notice ordered to be issued to respondent No. 4; petitioner directed to serve respondent No. 4 personally through dasti with office assistance; matter listed for 15.01.2026. No merits adjudication. ¶8

Krishna Vati vs State of U.P. Thru. Commissioner and Secy. Board of Revenue and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

WRIT - C No. - 11561 of 2025

Krishna Vati

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. Thru. Commissioner And Secy. Board Of Revenue And 3 Others	.....Resp	ondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Janendra Kumar Kumar Verma	Verma,	Deepak
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No.- 3

¶7

HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.

¶8

Issue notice to the respondent No. 4.

¶9

Steps be taken within a week.

¶10

In addition to normal mode of service, the petitioner is directed to serve respondent No. 4 personally, through dasti.

¶11

Office is directed to provide dasti to the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

¶12

List this matter on 15.01.2026.

¶13

(Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.)

¶14

December 9, 2025

¶15

Satish

¶16

Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Krishna Vati v. State of U.P. Thru. Commissioner and Secy. Board of Revenue and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishna Vati v. State of U.P. Thru. Commissioner and Secy. Board of Revenue and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Trisha Traders Thru. Proprietor Amit Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Tax and Registration Lko. and 2 Others

Vijay Kumar vs U.O.I., Ministry of External Affairs Office, New Delhi and Others

Rakesh Kumar vs U.O.I. Thru. Secy. Ministry of External Affairs Govt. of India New Delhi, India and 3 Others

Green Python Ventures Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Co-Owners Ashutosh Vaish and Neeraj Kumar Maurya and 2 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Food Safety and Drug Admini. Lko. and 6 Others

Karmendra Narayan Tiwari vs U.O.I. Thru. Secy. Ministry of Finance Deptt. of Revenue New Delhi and 2 Others

Sri Rajendra Prasad Singh vs M/S Arch Construction Thru. Partner Sri Santosh Kumar Singh and 3 Ohters