Ram Sundar v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Revenue Lko. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment sought by petitioner's counsel; matter listed in the next week as fresh.
Adjournment sought by petitioner's counsel; matter listed in the next week as fresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 11035 of 2025
Ram Sundar
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vedika Dwivedi, Himanshu Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 2
HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
Adjournment has been sought by learned counsel for the petitioner.
List in the next week as fresh.
December 3, 2025 Ashish Dewal
(Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.)
Digitally signed by :- ASHISH DEWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ram Sundar
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 3 Others
Sangeeta Chandra
Amitabh Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court