Held that the writ petition is dismissed for reasons of non-prosecution due to absence of petitioner's counsel and lack of interest in pursuing the old case.
The writ petition was dismissed for reasons of non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:8983
Court No. - 20
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 2816 of 1985
Petitioner :- Chauthi And Others
Respondent :- Deputy Director Of Consolidation Faizabad And Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- S.K. Mehrotra,Kamlesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- B.K. Singh
Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.
Order Date :- 12.2.2025 Muk
Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Chauthi And Others
Deputy Director Of Consolidation Faizabad And Others
Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
