A writ petition from 2000 was called in revised list; neither petitioner nor counsel appeared to press it, and the court inferred loss of interest by efflux of time. The single judge dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:9877
Court No. - 20
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 179 of 2000
Petitioner :- Ram Anuj Respondent :- D.D.C.Sultanpur And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.L.Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.
Order Date :- 14.2.2025 Abhishek Gupta
Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ram Anuj
D.D.C. Sultanpur
Others
Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
