A 1993 writ petition was called in the revised list with no appearance by the petitioner or counsel. Despite prior opportunities to file a copy of the impugned order, the petitioner did not pursue the matter, indicating loss of interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 20
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 17 of 1993 Petitioner :- Ram Dular Respondent :- D.D.C.And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- B.K.Chaudhary Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.
Order Date :- 30.1.2025 Arif
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non-prosecution given the petitioner's continued absence.
Ram Dular
D.D.C.
Others
Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
