A single-judge order allowing a writ petition. The judgment refers to a previous order for the disposal of the case without elaborating on the specific grounds or facts.
The writ petition is allowed; specific orders are contained in a parallel writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
WRIT - B No. - 128 of 2002
Gurumukh Singh And Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
| State Of U.P. Through Secy. Revenue Lucknow And Others .....Respondent(s) |
|---|
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) : L.M. Khare |
| Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. |
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
(Alok Mathur,J.)
August 25, 2025
RKM.
Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Chandra Pal Singh Khare and five others Vs. State of U.P. and 7 othersFollowed¶10
Writ B No.797 of 2002
Gurumukh Singh
Others
State Of U.P. Through Secy. Revenue Lucknow
Others
Alok Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
