A 2003 writ petition was called out for hearing with no appearance for the petitioner, though the State's Standing Counsel was present; the High Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
WRIT - B No. - 1175 of 2003
| Smt. Raheema | Versus .....Petitioner(s) |
|---|---|
| Deputy Director Of Consolid Lakhimpur And 8 Ors |
ation Kheri .....Respondent(s) |
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) Counsel for Respondent(s) |
: M.A. Khan, Karuna Shanker Rastogi : C.S.C, A.K.Singh Somvanshi, K.S.Rastogi, Pankaj Gupta, R.N Gupta |
Court No. - 30
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
(Manjive Shukla,J.)
September 22, 2025
akhilesh/-
Digitally signed by :- AKHILESHWAR KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Raheema
Deputy Director Of Consolidation Lakhimpur Kheri
Manjive Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
