Petitioner's writ petition was dismissed for want of instructions from the counsel at the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:4155
Court No. - 20
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 107 of 1999
Petitioner :- Krishna Mani Objection Filed Respondent :- D.D.C.Faizabad And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- M.A.Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent :- Chief Standing Counsel,I.D.Shukla,S.K.Mehrotra,Satya P. Pandey,Shailesh Tewari
Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.
Shri Anuj Kumar Verma holding brief on behalf of Shri M.A. Siddiqui has made a statement at the Bar that he had no instructions from the client.
Ms. Shadma Shahid holding brief on behalf of Shri S.K. Mehrotra is present for the private-respondents.
Shri Shobhit Saxena, learned Standing Counsel for the Staterespondents is present.
The case is dismissed for the want of instructions.
Order Date :- 22.1.2025 Sumaira
Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Krishna Mani
D.D.C. Faizabad
Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
