Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared for the petitioner to press it; interim order, if any, stood vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 5156 of 2002
Saurabh Gupta
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
| State Of U.P.Through The Secy.Urban Development And 2 Ors. |
.....Respondent(s) |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) : |
Karuna Shanker Rastogi |
| Counsel for Respondent(s) : |
C.S.C., U.K. Srivastava |
Court No. - 18
HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
(Shree Prakash Singh,J.)
December 18, 2025
AKS
Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Saurabh Gupta
State Of U.P. Through The Secy. Urban Development
Shree Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
