Petitioner superannuated in 2023 but gratuity and leave encashement were unpaid despite no inquiry or punishment order. Court disposed of the petition granting liberty to file a fresh representation before the Managing Director, to be considered and decided within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2117
Court No. - 19
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 312 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Kumar Ii Respondent :- U.P. State Food And Essential Commodities Corporation Ltd. Thru. Director And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahendra Pratap Singh,Piyush Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Kaushlendra Tewari
Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
Order Date : - 13.1.2025 Subodh/-
Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether post-retiral benefits such as gratuity and leave encashement withheld after superannuation must be decided upon the petitioner's representation?
Ram Kumar II
U.P. State Food and Essential Commodities Corporation Ltd. thru. Director
Managing Director, U.P. State Food and Essential Commodities Corporation Ltd.
Manish Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
