Dismissed¶¶10
Virendra Nath Singh v. U.P.Power Corp.Ltd.Its M.D.and 2 Ors.
Allahabad HCWRIA/2000875/2005
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench (neutral citation 2025:AHC-LKO:20730); WRIT-A No. 2000875 of 2005; decided 11.4.2025 by Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J. Petitioners Virendra Nath Singh and others challenged a retirement notice issued in a U.P. Power Corp. Ltd. service matter and sought continuance upto age 60. Dismissed as infructuous due to passage of time (2005 matter); interim order, if any, vacated; no adjudication on merits; no appearance by petitioners' counsel at hearing; respondent counsel Neerav Chitravanshi present. Useful only for its procedural outcome, not for any ratio on retirement/superannuation.
What did the court decide?
By efflux of time, with the matter pending since 2005 and no interim order operating, the writ petition has become infructuous. ¶¶9