Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared for the petitioner to press it; any interim order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 19811 of 2016
Subasini
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Edu.Govt.Of Up Lko.And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar Mishra, P.N. Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., J.B.S. Rathour
Court No. - 18
HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
(Shree Prakash Singh,J.)
December 8, 2025
Mayank
Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Subasini
State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Edu.Govt.Of Up Lko.And Ors.
Shree Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
