Disposed¶12

Priyanka Sachan v. State of U.P. and 7 Others

Allahabad HC4 Dec 2025WRIA/18274/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interim/adjournment order; service matter; challenge to punitive order dated 05.06.2025 said to rest on a departmental inquiry and to have resulted in dispensation/termination of petitioner's services; State of U.P. and 7 others respondents; Standing Counsel (Pranjal Mehrotra, Rahul Malviya) directed to obtain instructions; matter listed fresh for 18.12.2025 before Vikas Budhwar, J.; no statutory provisions, precedents, quantum or final disposal.

What the court decided

AI extract

Priyanka Sachan vs State of U.P. and 7 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - A No. - 18274 of 2025

Priyanka Sachan

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. And 7 Others

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Devottam Pandey, Pramod Kumar Singh
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C., Pranjal Mehrotra
Court No.- 34

¶9

HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.

¶10

Contention of the learned counsel for the writ petitioner is that the impugned order dated 05.06.2025 passed by the respondents cannot be sustained, as the same is punitive in nature based upon an inquiry and the inputs provided therein became the basis for dispensing of the services.

¶11