Disposed¶14

Ram Narayan Dangi v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC11 Dec 2025WRIA/17874/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interim order, Allahabad High Court WRIT - A No. 17874 of 2025 (11-12-2025), Manju Rani Chauhan, J. Keywords: post-retiral benefits; earned leave; stuff amount; pension for last five months; insurance amount; bonus; regular month-by-month pension; retired Nayab Muharir; Nagar Palika Parishad, Chirgaon, Jhansi; representations unanswered; counter affidavit / show cause; State of U.P.; next hearing 23-01-2026.

What did the court decide?

Interim direction: learned counsel for respondent no.4 is required to inform the respondent authorities either to pay the dues of the petitioner or to show cause by filing a counter affidavit on the next date; the matter is to be put up fresh on 23rd January, 2026. ¶14

Ram Narayan Dangi vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - A No. - 17874 of 2025

¶3

Ram Narayan Dangi

¶4

	Versus	.....Petitioner(s)
State Of U.P. And 3 Others		.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s)	:	Virendra Singh Patel
Counsel for Respondent(s)	:	C.S.C., Om Prakash Singh

¶5

Court No. - 52

¶6

HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent nos.1 to 3 and learned counsel for the respondent no.4.

¶8

The petitioner, who was initially appointed on 07.01.1984 on the post of Nayab Muharir in the office of Nagar Palika Parishad, Chirgaon, Jhansi, retired from service on 30.04.2024, has preferred the instant writ petition for a direction upon the respondent authoritiess to make payment of post retiral benefits, i.e. earned leave, stuff amount, amount of pension for last five months, insurance amount and bonus in favour of the peitioner as well as pay the regular pension month by month to him.

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for ventilation of his grievance, the petitioner has made several representations but to no avail.

¶10

It is painful to see that without any fault on his part, the petitioner is being compelled to run from pillar to post and has been forced to approach this Court for the payment of his legitimate dues. In the present time, authorities should pay attention in such matters pondering over as to how a person

¶11

WRIA No. 17874 of 2025

¶12

¶13

would meet out the needs in daily life of his dependents.

¶14

In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the respondent no.4 is required to inform the respondents authorities either to pay the dues of the petitioner or show cause by filing the counter affidavit on the next date, as to why the payment of the petitioner has not been made to him till date.

¶15

Put up this case on 23^rd January, 2026, as fresh.

¶16

December 11, 2025 Kalp Nath Singh

¶17

(Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.)

¶18

Digitally signed by :- KALP NATH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ram Narayan Dangi v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Narayan Dangi v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Mantasha Bee and Another vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Smt. Madhuri Baghel and Another vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Smt. Bobi and Another vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Smt Kamlesh Gautam and 2 Others vs State of Up and Another

Dal Chand @ Dal Chand Agarwal vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Shree Pal Singh vs State of U.P. and 3 Others