Writ petition concerning a service matter; counsel for opposite parties 4 to 6 appeared with power filed on record. Court directed the matter to be connected and listed along with a related writ petition of 2016 as fresh. No substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 145 of 2025
Petitioner :- Nanbachcha Shukla
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. In The Deptt. Of Nagar Vikas And 5 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Prabhaat Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Satish Chandra Kashish
Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
Order Date :- 13.1.2025
kvg/-
Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Nanbachcha Shukla
State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. In The Deptt. Of Nagar Vikas And 5 Others
Manish Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
