Petitioner challenged interlocutory orders; no one appeared for him even on revised call. The court held such interlocutory orders warrant no interference under Article 226 and dismissed the writ petition, directing communication of the order to the court below.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:25181
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1000070 of 2009
Petitioner :- Rajveer Sharma Respondent :- District Judge Lakhimpur Kheri Counsel for Petitioner :- N.N.Jaiswal,N.N. Jaiswal,P. Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C,Umesh Chandra Saxena
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
Order Date :- 1.5.2025 Arun
Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Should the writ petition challenging interlocutory orders be entertained under Article 226?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajveer Sharma
District Judge Lakhimpur Kheri
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
