The fact in brief are that the land lord-respondent filed an application under Section 20 of the U.P. Act 13 of 1972 seeking eviction of the petitioner from the premises under his tenancy after serving a notice under Section 106. The said suit was contested by the petitioners and as many as five points of the determination were framed by the J.S.C. Court. The first point of the determination with regard to the applicability of the U.P. Act 13 of 1972 was decided holding that on the premises in question U.P. Act 13 of 1972 was applicable. With regard to the second point pertaining to the denial of the title by the petitioner, the same was adjudicated in favour of the land lord holding that the petitioner had denied the title of the land lord, which was an infraction prescribed under Section 20(2)(f) of the U.P. Act 13 of 1972 and after noticing that the petitioner was in default of payment of rent, the suit was decreed. The claim of the land lord or mesne profit was rejected on the ground that the premises was covered under U.P. Act 13 of 1972. The judgement to that effect was passed by the J.S.C. Court on 03.01.2002. The petitioner aggrieved against the said judgement, preferred a revision under Section 25, which too was dismissed. The revisional court recorded that the findings in respect of the denial of the title by noticing that in the written statement itself, the petitioner had denied the title of the land lord and based upon own submission in the written statement, the revision came to be dismissed concurring with the judgement of the J.S.C. Court.
