Disposed
Inayatullah v. State of U.P. and 6 Others
Allahabad HCWPIL/3837/2025
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
¶2
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 3837 of 2025
¶3
Inayatullah
¶4
.....Petitioner(s)
¶5
Versus
¶6
State Of U.P. And 6 Others
¶7
.....Respondent(s)
¶8
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Pramod Kumar Singh |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : C.S.C., Pankaj Kumar Gupta |
¶9
Court No. - 55
¶10
HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.
¶11
- In view of the prayer made in the instant public interest litigation, instruction is required from State & Gaon Sabha.
¶12
- Mr. Ravi Singh Parihar, learned Standing Counsel for State and Mr. Pankaj Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the gaon sabha shall obtain instruction in the matter within two weeks.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Inayatullah
- respondent
State Of U.P.
- respondent
6 Others
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPIL/3837/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court