Disposed¶8

Smt Sapna Panday v. Ranu Pandey

Allahabad HC17 Mar 2025TACL/995/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Substituted service; publication of notice in daily newspapers; insufficient address; affidavit of service; office report; village-Jagdishpur; divorce application address; transfer application (civil); High Court of Judicature at Allahabad; Neeraj Tiwari; interim order continuance; listing 15.04.2025.

What did the court decide?

Interlocutory directions for substituted service: publication of notice of pendency in 2 widely circulated daily newspapers in the area concerned; petitioner to complete steps within two weeks and file an affidavit of service with original newspaper copies by the next date; case listed on 15.04.2025; earlier interim order to continue till the next date of listing. ¶8

Smt Sapna Panday vs Ranu Pandey — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶8

Issue for consideration

Mode of service of notice of pendency on the opposite party, where the Office report shows no person in the opposite party's name at the given address and the address supplied by the petitioner is insufficient.

¶8

Court's answer

In view of the Office report dated 25.02.2025, the address provided by the petitioner is insufficient.

¶7

Ratio / Principle

Notice regarding pendency of the case before this Court is to be published in widely circulated 2 daily newspapers in the area concerned.

¶8

Key takeaways

Steps for the publication are to be taken by the petitioner within two weeks from the date of the order.ratio¶9
After publication, the petitioner shall file an affidavit of service annexing the original copy of the newspapers by the next date fixed.ratio¶10
The interim order granted earlier shall continue till the next date of listing.ratio

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Transfer Application (Civil) No. 995 of 2024, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Neeraj Tiwari, J.; Order dated 17.3.2025). Notice issued on 13.12.2024 could not be served: Office report dated 25.02.2025 showed no person in the name of the opposite party residing at village-Jagdishpur, and the address supplied by the petitioner (stated to be the same as in the divorce application) was found insufficient. The Court directed substituted service by publication of notice of pendency in 2 widely circulated daily newspapers of the area, to be completed by the petitioner within two weeks, followed by an affidavit of service annexing original copies of the newspapers by the next date fixed. Case listed on 15.04.2025; interim order granted earlier to continue till the next date of listing.

Smt Sapna Panday v. Ranu Pandey

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Sapna Panday v. Ranu Pandey

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Satya Prakash and 3 Others

Shriram Genral Insurance Company Limited vs Smt. Madhuri Devi and 3 Others

Vivek Singh Alias Mintu Singh vs State of U.P.

Ghaziabad Development Authority vs State of Uttar Pradesh and 4 Others

Smt Indu Devi and 4 Others vs Vinay Kumar Agrahari and Another

Anoop Singh vs State of U.P. and Another