Saumya Tripathi @ Sakshi Tripathi v. Abhimanyu Pandey
Case brief
What is this about?
Transfer Application (Civil) No. 316 of 2025, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Court No. 20, Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi, J., dated December 9, 2025. Keywords: Section 24 C.P.C. transfer application; wife/applicant seeking transfer; Section 9 Hindu Marriage Act; restitution of conjugal rights; Case No. 648/2025 (Abhimanyu Pandey vs. Sakshi Tripathi); Family Court-III Prayagraj to District Pratapgarh; FIR No. 0130/2025 Kotwali City Police Station; marriage solemnized 25.02.2024; residing at Pratapgarh since 12.03.2025; unemployed applicant dependent on father. Interim order: typographical correction in prayer clause allowed; notice to opposite party both ways (regular and dasti); service steps within seven working days; affidavit of service on next date; listed fresh on 13th January, 2026; transfer merits not adjudicated; no precedent cases cited.
What did the court decide?
Interim directions only: prayer to correct the typographical error ('Prayagraj' for 'Pratapgarh') in the prayer clause allowed; notice to the opposite party ordered both ways (regular and dasti); service steps due within seven working days, with dasti notice through the Office if steps are timely; affidavit of service due on the next date; case listed fresh on 13th January, 2026. The merits of the transfer request were not decided at this stage.