Special appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as neither the appellant nor the opposite party appeared; only learned Standing Counsel was present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 263 of 2019
Smt. Sushila Singh
.....Appellant(s)
Versus
The State Of U.P.Throu.Secy.Deptt.Of Aviation Lko.And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Shrish Kumar Gaur, Hemant Kumar Mishra, Jyotindra P.Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Aprajita Bansal
Court No. - 1
HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. None appears on behalf of the appellant or the opposite party. Learned Standing Counsel for the State Shri Anil Kumar Singh Visen is present.
2. The appeal is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution .
(Manjive Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.)
August 27, 2025
Arnima
Digitally signed by :- ARNIMA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Sushila Singh
The State Of U.P.Throu.Secy.Deptt.Of Aviation Lko.And Ors.
Rajan Roy
Manjive Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
