Dismissed
Bal Kumar v. Ram Bhajan
Allahabad HCSAPLD/135/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Third Appeal Defective No. 135 of 2019 where the appellant was absent; the appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
¶2
SECOND APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 135 of 2019
¶3
| Bal Kumar | Versus | .....Appellant(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Ram Bhajan | .....Respondent(s) | |
| Counsel for Appellant(s) Counsel for Respondent(s) |
: Syed Aftab Ahmad : Ashutosh Kumar Singh, Samarth Sax |
Singh, Hari Om ena |
¶4
Court No. - 19
¶5
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
¶6
- Case is called out in the revised call.
¶7
- None is present for the appellants even in the revised list.
¶8
- Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
¶9
- Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
¶10
(Prashant Kumar,J.)
¶11
December 12, 2025
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Bal Kumar
- respondent
Ram Bhajan
Coram
AI extract
Prashant Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- SAPLD/135/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court