Jogi v. Bhagirathi and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Seconds appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as appellant had no instructions and was not interested in prosecuting the case. No substantive legal proposition derived from this procedural order.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:17510
Court No. - 19
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 96 of 1992
Appellant :- Jogi Respondent :- Bhagirathi And Ors Counsel for Appellant :- Mohd. Arif Khan
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Matter is taken up in the revised call.
Shri Akbar Ali Khan, learned counsel holding brief of Shri Aslam Khan, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he does not have any instructions in the matter.
It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 27.3.2025 Vandit
Digitally signed by :- VANDIT AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Jogi
- respondent
Bhagirathi And Ors
Coram
Ajay Bhanot
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- SAPL/96/1992
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court