Deen Dayal v. Phool Chandra
Case brief
What is this about?
Deen Dayal v Phool Chandra; Second Appeal No. 377 of 1993; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; Court No. 20; dismissed for want of prosecution; non-appearance of counsel; no adjournment slip; interim order vacated; Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi; December 11, 2025.
What did the court decide?
In view of the appellant's counsel's absence, the absence of any adjournment slip, and the matter pertaining to the year 1993, the second appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. ¶14