Jagdish Yadav v. Nand Lal Yadav and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
A second appeal was called in revised list; no appellant representative appeared and no adjournment was requested, so the court dismissed it for want of prosecution.
A second appeal was called in revised list; no appellant representative appeared and no adjournment was requested, so the court dismissed it for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
SECOND APPEAL No. - 272 of 2016
Jagdish Yadav
.....Appellant(s)
| Versus | |
|---|---|
| Nand Lal Yadav And 3 Others | .....Respondent(s) |
| Counsel for Appellant(s) : Counsel for Respondent(s) : |
Anil Kumar Sharma, Sri Niwas Jaiswal, Vimal Kishor Singh, Vishwajeet Mishra Vimal Kishor Singh |
Court No. - 19
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
(Prashant Kumar,J.)
December 10, 2025
Anupam S/-
Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Jagdish Yadav
Nand Lal Yadav
Prashant Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court