In this second appeal, the High Court at Lucknow dismissed the matter for want of prosecution as the appellant's counsel was absent without an adjournment slip. The judgment is a one-line order disposing of the appeal without substantive reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
SECOND APPEAL No. - 210 of 1994
Smt. Prem Lata
.....Appellant(s)
Versus
Dularay
.....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : H.P.Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : D.C.Mukherji
Court No. - 20
HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J.
(Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.)
Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Prem Lata
Dularay
Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
