This court dismissed the second appeal for want of prosecution after rejecting a further adjournment request due to counsel's illness, despite a prior order explicitly prohibiting further adjournments for such grounds. Appeal decision dated 20.2.2025.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution; adjournment for illness rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:11194
Court No. - 17
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 9 of 2006
Appellant :- Ram Chandra And 5 Ors. Respondent :- Bharat Singh And Anr. Counsel for Appellant :- S.P.Pathak,Chandan Lal Dixit,Kunwar R.P. Singh,Ram Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Himanshu Shekhar Awasthi
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
"Despite the request of this Court to argue the case as it pertains to the year 2006, learned counsel for the appellant has shown his inability to argue the case submitting that he is not well prepared with the case and prays for adjournment of the case.
List this case again.
It is made clear that on the next date of listing, the case shall not be adjourned on any ground whatsoever as it is an old case pertaining to the year 2006."
Order Date :- 20.2.2025 DiVYa
Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ram Chandra And 5 Ors.
Bharat Singh And Anr.
Manish Kumar
Divya Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
