Bhanmati and Ors. v. Smt. Champa Devi and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal of 2011 dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared for the appellants despite a prior warning against adjournment.
Second appeal of 2011 dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared for the appellants despite a prior warning against adjournment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:47682
Court No. - 7
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 198 of 2011
Appellant :- Bhanmati And Ors. Respondent :- Smt. Champa Devi And Ors. Counsel for Appellant :- R.K.Srivastava,Kunj Bihari Pandey,R.K. Srivastava,Raghaw Ram Upadhyay,Vinod Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- Ishwar Dutt Shukla,I.D.Shukla,S.K.Mehrotra
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
None appears for the appellants.
The appeal is of the year, 2011.
Learned counsel for the respondents is present.
This Court on 16.07.2025 had passed the following order which reads as under:
"Sri R.R. Upadhyay learned counsel for the appellant has sent an illness slip.
Learned counsel for the respondent is present.
Considering the fact that the appeal is of the year, 2011, the matter shall not be adjourned on the next date fixed.
In case, if the counsel for the parties do not appear on the next date they shall make alternate arrangement.
List on 30.07.2025 under the same head."
Today, again as noticed above, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Consigned to record.
Order Date :- 14.8.2025 Harshita
Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Bhanmati And Ors.
Smt. Champa Devi And Ors.
Jaspreet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court