Smt.Raghurai v. Ram Shanker and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal of 1996 dismissed for want of prosecution as neither appellant's counsel appeared nor an adjournment slip was filed; any interim order stood vacated.
Second appeal of 1996 dismissed for want of prosecution as neither appellant's counsel appeared nor an adjournment slip was filed; any interim order stood vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
SECOND APPEAL No. - 160 of 1996
Smt.Raghurai
.....Appellant(s)
Versus
Ram Shanker And Another
.....Respondent(s)
| Counsel for Appellant(s) | : D.C.Mukherjee, Ved Prakash Verma |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : Verendra Misra |
Court No. - 20
HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J.
(Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.)
Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Raghurai
Ram Shanker
Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court