This court dismissed the second appeal for want of prosecution due to the appellant's absence and failure to request an adjournment. No substantive decision on merits was rendered.
Second appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:7670
Court No. - 17
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 152 of 2001
Appellant :- Ayodhya Prasad Verma Respondent :- Amar Bahadur Singh And Others Counsel for Appellant :- M.A.Khan,H.P. Srivastava,Mohiuddin Khan,V.K.Verma,Ved Prakash Verma Counsel for Respondent :- H.P.Srivastava,Mohd Wajid Irfan
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
Case has been called in the revised list.
Neither the learned counsel for the appellant is present nor any request has been made on his behalf for adjournment of the case.
Sri Hal Saud Khan, holding brief of Sri Mohd Wajid Irfan, learned counsel for the respondent is present.
The second appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 6.2.2025 Renu/-
Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ayodhya Prasad Verma
Amar Bahadur Singh
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
