Balbir Singh v. Raja Ram Shukla and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal of 2011 dismissed for want of prosecution as neither party appeared despite counsel names on record.
Second appeal of 2011 dismissed for want of prosecution as neither party appeared despite counsel names on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40752
Court No. - 8
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 135 of 2011
Appellant :- Balbir Singh Respondent :- Raja Ram Shukla And Ors. Counsel for Appellant :- J.K.Sinha Counsel for Respondent :- P.K. Srivastava
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
The appeal is of the year, 2011.
None has put in appearance on behalf of either of the parties though the names of Sri J.K. Sinha and Sri P.K. Srivastava have been shown as counsel for the appellant and counsel for the respondent respectively.
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Consigned to record.
Order Date :- 17.7.2025 Harshita
Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Balbir Singh
Raja Ram Shukla
Jaspreet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court