Dismissed
Brijesh Chandra v. Rajesh Kumar
Allahabad HCSAPL/104/2009
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Second appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as counsel was absent and no adjournment requested.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Court No. - 17
¶2
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 104 of 2009
¶3
Appellant :- Brijesh Chandra Respondent :- Rajesh Kumar Counsel for Appellant :- G.D.Pandey,Jai Pal Singh,Krishan Kanhaya Pal,Pooja Pal Counsel for Respondent :- Dinesh Kumar Srivastava,Basant Lal,Dileep Kumar,Roshan Lal
¶4
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶5
- Case has been called in the revised list.
¶6
- Learned counsel for the appellant is neither present to press the second appeal nor any request for adjournment of the case has been made on his behalf.
¶7
- As such, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
¶8
Order Date :- 29.1.2025 Raj
¶9
Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Brijesh Chandra
- respondent
Rajesh Kumar
Coram
AI extract
Manish Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- SAPL/104/2009
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Prem Nath Vs Shri Raj Karan Nayyar Senior Superintendent of Police Dist. Ayodhya
Smt. Prabhawati Vs Sri Santosh Kumar Ojha, Up Ziladhikari, Utraula, Balrampur
Smt. Rani Balmiki Vs Indrajeet Singh, Nagar Ayukt Municipal Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Lko.
Ajeet Pratap Singh Vs Sri Rakesh Kumar, Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Belha, Pratapgarh