Applicant sought anticipatory bail; counsel stated he did not wish to press the application and the applicant would seek regular bail before the trial court. The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as not pressed, with liberty to apply for bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45646
Court No. - 13
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 940 of 2025
Applicant :- Sanjeet Saroj Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko.
Counsel for Applicant :- Sarjoo Ram,Chandan Prasad,Prashant Shekhar,Ved Prakash Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
After making his submissions at some length, Sri Sarjoo Ram, the learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to press the anticipatory bail application and the applicant will appear before the trial court and seek his release on bail.
Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as not pressed leaving it open to the applicant to file an application for his release on bail.
[Subhash Vidyarthi, J.]
Order Date :- 6.8.2025 Ram.
Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjeet Saroj
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko.
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
