Vijay Yadav v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application concerning two FIRs lodged in the same matter. The court noted no explanation for the second FIR and granted the State three weeks to obtain instructions. Matter listed fresh on 7.1.2026.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9334 of 2025
Vijay Yadav
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s):Rajesh, Ravi Lal Gupta
Counsel for Opposite Party(s):G.A.
Court No. - 71
HON'BLE NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. List revised.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant and the learned AGA
are present.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Vijay Yadav
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
2 Others
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- NABAIL/9334/2025
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court