Allowed

Chandraveer Singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC18 Nov 2025NABAIL/8951/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application for alleged use of a forged character certificate to obtain a security guard job; charge sheet filed, no criminal history. Court, citing factors for anticipatory bail and without expressing opinion on merits, granted bail with conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on furnishing personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence and co-operation during trial.

Chandraveer Singh vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 8951 of 2025

¶3

Chandraveer Singh

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus
State of U.P.	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Alok Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 72

¶7

HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.

¶8

Heard Shri Alok Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri B.P. Maurya, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶9

The present application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime no.254 of 2025, under Section 318(4) of B.N.S., Police Station Tundla, District Firozabad, with the prayer that in the event of arrest, applicant may be released on bail.

¶10

It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the applicant has not gained any benefit from the alleged use of forged document and he had applied for issuance of the character certificate and the concerned person of the said agency is Narayan Hari and the said Narayan Hari has admitted in his statement under Section 180 BNSS that the applicant had entrusted him the task of getting the character certificate prepared. It is further submitted that the charge sheet in this case has already been submitted and the applicant is having no criminal history. It was also submitted that applicant undertakes to co-operate during trial and he would appear as and when required by the investigating agency or Court. It has been stated that in case, applicant is granted anticipatory bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail and will co-operate with the investigation and would obey all conditions of bail.

¶11

NABAIL No. 8951 of 2025

¶12

¶13

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. has opposed the application for anticipatory bail.

¶14

As per allegation in the first information report, the applicant is said to have produced a forged character certificate for securing a job of Security Guard in a private Security Agency. It is further submitted that the charge sheet in this case has already been submitted and the applicant is having no criminal history.

¶15

It may be stated that in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra, (2011) 1 SCC 694 , it has been held by Hon'ble Supreme Court that while deciding anticipatory bail, Court must consider nature and gravity of accusation, antecedent of accused, possibility of accused to flee from justice and that Court must evaluate entire available material against the accused carefully and that the exact role of the accused has also to be taken into consideration.

¶16

In the instant case, considering the settled principle of law regarding anticipatory bail, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, role of applicant and all attending facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits, a case for anticipatory bail is made out.

¶17

The anticipatory bail application is allowed.

¶18

In the event of arrest of the applicant- Chandraveer Singh involved in the aforesaid case crime shall be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned, with the following conditions :-

¶19

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence and that he would appear before the trial Court on the date fixed unless exempted by the Court concerned;

¶20

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her/them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶21

NABAIL No. 8951 of 2025

¶22

¶23

(iii) The applicant would co-operate during trial and would not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶24

(iv) The applicant shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court concerned.

¶25

In default of any of the conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

¶26

(Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.)

¶27

November 18, 2025 RKM

¶28

Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Chandraveer Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandraveer Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Divyam vs State of U.P.

Sahab Lal @ Daya Saroj vs State of U.P.

Suhaib Ui Islam vs State of U.P.

Shiv Shankar Seth Alias Babu Seth vs State of U.P. and Another

Viru Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

Amit Kumar vs State of U.P. and Another