Hasan Haider v. State of U.P.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 8894 of 2025
Hasan Haider
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P.
.....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohammad Faisal Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 71
HON'BLE NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
- Learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. are present.
- Learned A.G.A. states that nothing has been averred in the application/ affidavit moved by the accused applicant regarding criminal history of the applicant.
- Learned counsel for the applicant is directed to explain the criminal history of the applicant through supplementary affidavit.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Hasan Haider
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- NABAIL/8894/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Rajiv Lochan Shukla
- Order 2 · Rajiv Lochan Shukla
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court