Amir vs State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 8759 of 2025

Amir		.....Applicant(s)
	Versus
State of U.P.		.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	:	Brajesh Kumar Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	:	G.A.

¶4

Court No. - 72

¶5

HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.

¶6

Heard Sri B.K. Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri S.D. Shukla, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶7

The present application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime no. 462 of 2021 under Sections 452, 323, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Rasoolpur, District Firozabad with the prayer that in the event of arrest, the applicant may be released on bail.

¶8

It has been contended by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that chargesheet in the case has already been filed and maximum punishment which can be imposed upon conviction is imprisonment upto seven years. It is also submitted that no specific role has been assigned to the applicant. It was also submitted that applicant undertakes to cooperate during trial and he would appear as and when required by the investigating agency or Court and in case he is granted anticipatory bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail and would obey all conditions of bail.

¶9

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

¶10

I have considered the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties.

¶11

NABAIL No. 8759 of 2025

¶12

2

¶13

Chargesheet in the case has already been filed and as per the FIR, applicant along with co-accused persons are said to have assaulted the first informant as a result of which, he received injuries which are simple in nature. Maximum punishment which can be imposed upon conviction is imprisonment upto seven years.

¶14

It may be stated that in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra, (2011) 1 SCC 694, it has been held by Hon'ble Supreme Court that while deciding anticipatory bail, the Court must consider nature and gravity of accusation, antecedents of the accused, possibility of accused to flee from justice and that Court must evaluate the entire available material against the accused carefully and the exact role of accused has also to be taken into consideration.

¶15

In the instant case, considering the settled principle of law regarding anticipatory bail, submissions of learned counsel for the parties, nature of accusation, role of applicant and all attending facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits, a case for anticipatory bail is made out.

¶16

9. The anticipatory bail application is allowed .

¶17

In the event of arrest of the applicant Amir involved in the aforesaid case crime, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned, with the following conditions :-

¶18

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence and that he would appear before the trial Court on the date fixed unless exempted by the Court concerned;

¶19

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her/them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶20

(iii) The applicant would co-operate during trial and would not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶21

NABAIL No. 8759 of 2025

¶22

3

¶23

(iv) The applicant shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court concerned.

¶24

In default of any of the conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

¶25

(Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.)

¶26

November 6, 2025 Madhurima

¶27

Digitally signed by :- MADHURIMA GARG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Amir v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amir v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajeev Alias Raju and 4 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Shiv Dayal vs State of U.P.

Sunny Chauhan Alias Sunny Kumar vs State of U.P. and Another

Anjali Kumari vs State of U.P. and Another

Tanuj Kumar Pandey vs State of U.P.

Saanuullah vs State of U.P. and Another