Mohd Raghib v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS. Counsel stated the applicant was willing to marry the victim but lacked instructions. The court adjourned the matter to 19 January 2026.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 10191 of 2025
Mohd Raghib
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Umair Mahmood
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 71
HON'BLE NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
- Learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. are present.
- During course of hearing learned counsel for the applicant requested that the accused applicant is ready to marry with the victim of this case but however he has not got specific instructions in this regard.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mohd Raghib
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Another
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- NABAIL/10191/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Rajiv Lochan Shukla
- Order 2 · Rajiv Lochan Shukla
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court