Guddu Alias Asgar Ansari and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 10029 of 2025

¶3

Guddu Alias Asgar Ansari And Another

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kamlesh Kumar Singh, Vivek Kushwaha Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 64

¶7

HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.

¶8

Heard counsel for the applicants, Sri Neeraj Kumar Sharma, learned AGA for the State and perused the material on record.

¶9

This application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 26 of 2025, under Sections 3/5A/8 of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and Section 11 of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, Police Station - Iliya, District -Chandauli, during the pendency of trial.

¶10

Counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicants were not arrested at the spot. The name of the applicants was disclosed by the co-accused Yaseen Ansari, who was arrested at the spot. The said statement, insofar as it implicates the applicants, is unreliable. False recovery of livestock has been shown from the alleged vehicle. There is no independent witness to the alleged recovery. Investigation has been completed. During the course of investigation, the applicant was granted anticipatory bail till submission of police report by this Court vide order dated 21.05.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application No.3995 of 2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The applicants had cooperated in the investigation. The applicants have been summoned by the concerned Court. No custodial interrogation is required. The applicants have no criminal antecedents. The applicants have apprehension of their arrest in the above mentioned case. In case, the applicants are granted anticipatory bail, they will not misuse the said liberty.

¶11

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not

¶12

NABAIL No. 10029 of 2025

¶13

2

¶14

satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record.

¶15

Having regard to the submissions made, considering the nature of accusations, antecedents of the applicants, and the fact that the applicants were not arrested at the spot. The name of the applicants was disclosed by the co-accused Yaseen Ansari, who was arrested at the spot. Further, during the course of investigation, the applicant was granted anticipatory bail till submission of police report. Moreover, investigation has been completed; charge sheet has been filed; the applicants had cooperated in the investigation; the applicants have been summoned by the concerned court, no custodial interrogation is required; without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicants are entitled for anticipatory bail.

¶16

In the event of arrest, the applicants Guddu Alias Asgar Ansari and Ejaj Khan, involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on anticipatory bail during pendency of trial, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-

¶17

(i) the applicants shall make themselves available on each date fixed in the matter by the court concerned;

¶18

(ii) the applicants shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court;

¶19

(iii) the applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if they have passports, the same shall be deposited by them before the concerned court.

¶20

In default of any of the conditions, the court concerned is at liberty to pass appropriate orders for enforcing and compelling the same.

¶21

The application stands disposed of.

December 2, 2025

Manish Kr

(Vivek Varma,J.)

Digitally signed by :- MANISH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Guddu Alias Asgar Ansari and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Guddu Alias Asgar Ansari and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shyam Narayan and Another vs State of U.P.

Bachhu Singh vs State of U.P.

Hanuman Singh vs State of U.P.

Mukesh Bansal and 2 Others vs State of U.P.

Abhay Yadav vs State of U.P.

Suryabhan vs State of U.P. and Another