Aneeta Vishwakarma and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Allahabad HCNA529/4707/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Applicants said Family Court maintenance awards remained unpaid despite an execution case; the High Court sought a status report on the execution case from the Presiding Officer, Family Court, Azamgarh and listed the matter for January 2026.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
¶2
APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4707 of 2025
¶3
Aneeta Vishwakarma And 2 Others
¶4
.....Applicant(s)
¶5
Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Srivastava, Saurabh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
¶6
Court No. - 87
¶7
HON'BLE ANIL KUMAR-X, J.
¶8
- Learned counsel for applicants and Shri Acharya Rajesh Tripathi, learned AGA for the State are present.
¶9
- Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that the applicants have not received any amount of maintenance awarded by the Family Court despite the filing of the execution case.
¶10
- In the given circumstances, a status report of Execution Case No.149 of 2020 be called from the concerned Presiding Officer through Principal Judge, Family Court, Azamgarh.
¶11
- Registrar ( Compliance ) is directed to communicate this order to concerned court Principal Judge, Family Court, Azamgarh for compliance.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Aneeta Vishwakarma And 2 Others
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
AI extract
Anil Kumar-X
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- NA529/4707/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court