Disposed¶13

Smt. Mamta v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC21 Jul 2025NA529/2276/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Neutral Citation 2025:AHC:118151; APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. 2276 of 2025; Smt. Mamta v. State of U.P. and Another; expedited disposal direction under S.529 BNSS; pending S.125 CrPC maintenance Case No. 399 of 2023, Family Court Jhansi; delay by opposite party/husband; adjournment restraint; stakeholder cooperation duty; overburdened Family Courts U.P.; disposed of 21.7.2025.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the court concerned (Principal Judge, Family Court, Jhansi) to decide Case No. 399 of 2023 (S.125 CrPC) expeditiously; no unnecessary adjournments to be sought or granted; all stakeholders bound to assist the Court. ¶13

Smt. Mamta vs State of U.P. and Another — Maintenance and Alimony | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:118151

¶2

Court No. - 83

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 2276 of 2025

¶4

Applicant :- Smt. Mamta Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Kumar Maurya,Surya Prakash Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.

¶6

This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Case No. 399 of 2023 under Section 125 CrPC, Police Station-Erach, District- Jhansi pending in the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jhansi expeditiously within stipulated period.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶8

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the aggrieved wife of opposite party no.2 and the present case is pending since 2023. It is also submitted that the opposite party no.2 is not cooperating with the Court concerned and is adopting delaying tactics in disposal of the said.

¶9

I have considered the submissions and perused the record.

¶10

It reveals from the perusal of the order sheets that opposite party no.2 is not cooperating with the progress of the case. This Court is also aware of the fact that the Family Courts in the State of U.P. are overburdened with the cases and are, as such gasping for breath.

¶11

In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to decide the aforesaid case expeditiously, keeping in view the heavy work load in the said Court. It is further directed that no unnecessary adjournment will be sought/granted.

¶12

It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder of the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and execution authorities, advocates, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case.

¶13

With the above observations, the application stands disposed of .

¶14

Order Date :- 21.7.2025 Fhd

¶15

Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Smt. Mamta v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Mamta v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pushpa Verma vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Sri Mangal Traders through Its Proprietor Mohit Agrawal vs State of U.P. and Another

Pawan Nagar vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt Chanda Devi vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Akansha Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

Ram Singh vs State of U.P. and Another