Gufran v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The court adjourned an application under Section 528 BNSS as no supplementary affidavit annexing the verified compromise had been filed despite a prior directive. The interim order was extended until the next listing date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 73
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 9248 of 2025
Applicant :- Gufran Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Chandan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Vijay Kumar,G.A.
Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J.
- List revised.
- None appeared for either of the parties, however learned A.G.A. is present.
- This Court vide order dated 21.03.2025 has directed the parties to appear before the court below to get their compromise verified and file supplementary affidavit annexing copy of the compromise as well as verification order.
- Till date, no supplementary affidavit has been filed.
- In the interest of justice, case is adjourned for the day.
- List this matter on 20.08.2025 before appropriate Bench.
- Interim order, if any, is extended till the next date of listing.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Gufran
Coram
Dinesh Pathak
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- NA528/9248/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court