Vinod Kumar v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Application under Section 528 BNSS to quash Gangster Act proceedings based on a single case in which the applicant was acquitted. Court sought instructions from the State and stayed further proceedings against the applicant till next date.
What did the court decide?
Further proceedings of Special Session Trial No.374 of 2016 stayed against the applicant only till next date of listing.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 47341 of 2025
Vinod Kumar
| Versus | .....Applicant(s) |
|---|---|
| State Of U.P. And 3 Others | .....Opposite Party(s) |
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Jaideep Pandey |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
Court No. - 78
HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
- Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned A.G.A. for State.
- This application has been preferred for quashing the chargesheet dated 13.01.2016 and cognizance/ summoning order dated 18.07.2016 as well as entire criminal proceeding of Special Session Trial No.374 of 2016 (State of U.P. Versus Guddu and others), arising out of Case Crime No.380 of 2015, under Sections 3(1) of Gangster Act, Police Station- Asmoli, DistrictSambhal, pending in the court of Special Judge Gangster Act/ Additional District Judge, Court No.5, Moradabad.
- It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been implicated under the Gangsters Act solely on the basis of a single case. The applicant has already been acquitted in that case by the learned trial court vide judgment and order dated 25.05.2017 in S.T. No.156 of 2016. It is further submitted that in view of judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Farhana vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others, SLP (Crl.) No.437 of 2023, the proceedings of the present case may also be quashed against the applicant.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether chargesheet and cognizance under the Gangster Act can be quashed where applicant was implicated on a single case and has since been acquitted in it.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Vinod Kumar
- respondent
State Of U.P.
- respondent
Guddu
- respondent
Others (Opposite Party)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- NA528/47341/2025
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court