Disposed

Jameer Ahmad and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC18 Nov 2025NA528/45351/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application under Section 528 BNSS to quash summoning order and proceedings in a complaint case based on alleged compromise. Court directed parties to approach the Trial Court for verification of the compromise deed before quashing was granted.

What did the court decide?

Directed parties to approach Trial Court for verification of compromise; no coercive action until verification.

Jameer Ahmad and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 45351 of 2025

¶3

Jameer Ahmad And 2 Others

¶4

	Versus .....Applicant(s)
State of U.P. and Another	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: Rajiv Sisodia, Shashank Dwivedi : G.A.

¶5

Court No. - 80

¶6

HON'BLE NAND PRABHA SHUKLA, J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶8

The present application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed to quash the summoning order dated 12.10.2025 as well as entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 614 of 2015, (Shahbuddeen v. Jameer Ahmad and others) under Sections 392, 323, 324, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station-Nehtaur, District Bijnor pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial MagistrateIst, Bijnor.

¶9

Learned counsel for the applicants submit that the parties have amicably settled their disputes vide compromise dated 02.09.2025, which has been placed as "Annexure No.-4" to the application. Therefore, no useful purpose would be served in continuing the proceedings before the Court concerned and the same is not only sheer wastage of time of the Court but also abuse of process of law.

¶10

Learned A.G.A., however, submits that it is the Trial Court, which has to verify the fact as to whether the parties have entered into compromise, hence the applicants may approach the concerned Court and move an application with respect to compromise between the parties, which will be decided in accordance with law.

¶11

In view of above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the applicants and opposite party No. 2 are directed to appear before the

¶12

NA528 No. 45351 of 2025

¶13

¶14

Trial Court along with compromise deed as well certified copy of this order within three weeks from today. It is expected that Court concerned may fix a date for the verification of the compromise and after ensuring the presence of the parties, pass an appropriate order with respect to the same in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, after giving opportunity of hearing to both the parties, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, if there is no other legal impediment. While passing the order verifying the compromise, the Court concerned shall also record the statements of the parties as to whether all the terms and conditions mentioned in the original compromise deed, so filed, have been fulfilled or not.

¶15

The Court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings.

¶16

Till verification of compromise between the parties by the Court concerned, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.

¶17

With the aforesaid directions, this application is disposed of .

¶18

(Nand Prabha Shukla,J.)

¶19

November 18, 2025 Aditya Tripathi

¶20

Digitally signed by :- ADITYA TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Jameer Ahmad and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jameer Ahmad and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Constable Yaspal Singh and 4 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Murad Ahamad @ Ruhel and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Sukhpal Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

Mohit Sharma vs State of U.P. and Another

Dayaram and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Girijesh Patel vs State of U.P. and Another